I find myself need to make a clarification for the second time in my blogging career. I certainly did not think that anybody would mistake the joke I made about subjective truth with the point of the Objective Truth in part V of the series I am writing. Below is the original text with the corrections below it.

<< *Statistical zero, where scientists usually write something off as impossible, is 1 in 10to the 50*^{th} power, or 1 with 50 zeros after it.

*There are relatively few atheists among neurologists and brain surgeons and among astrophysicists, but many among psychologists, sociologists, and historians. The reason seems obvious: the first group study divine design, the second group study human undesign.*

*Someone once said that if you sat a million monkeys at a million typewriters for a million years, one of them would eventually type out all of Hamlet by chance. However, when we find the text of Hamlet, we do not wonder whether it came from chance or monkeys. There are all kinds of debates on this concept and I am not sure I really want to discuss it, but it did seem somewhat appropriate here and leads to my conclusion for this part. *

*Why then does the atheist use that incredibly improbable explanation for the universe? Clearly, because it is his only chance of remaining an atheist. At this point, we need a psychological explanation of the Atheist rather than a logical explanation of the universe. That is an objective truth (subjective conclusion though I believe it to be the truth) that is true for me and you, even if you do not want to believe it*. >>

The inference to the subjective conclusion was the need of a psychological exam for the Atheist. The objective truth was the concept of statistical zero. We will be examining the mathematical probabilities of some of the chance happenings claimed by evolutionary scientists and the convoluted statements to try to dismiss the Objective Truth of statistical zero.

**PART VI**

Warning: this portion occasionally contains strong language (which may be unsuitable for children), unusual humor (which may be unsuitable for adults), and advanced mathematics (which may be unsuitable for liberal-arts majors).

Place holder on 7/2/2016 to be completed later

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*